This website is best viewed in a browser that supports web standards.
Skip to content or, if you would rather, Skip to navigation.
Expand All Questions | Collapse All Questions
Consistent with our Culture of Quality, Northwest systematically listens to its students and stakeholders. Our Listening and Learning System is comprehensive, multi-faceted, and longitudinal (see table that begins on the next page). Key findings from these systems are fed to departments for use in varying steps of the SSPP. Strategic Planning Council (SPC) members also gather key information from various student/stakeholder groups throughout the year and feed this into the environmental scan. The SPC retreats themselves serve as a common listening tool for our students and stakeholders. Varying U.S. and U.K. organizations have benchmarked our process.
The Provost, deans, chairs, and Registrar, on an on-going basis, monitor use of facilities, course and program selection patterns, grades, and use of supplemental services and student satisfaction with academic processes. As they occur, changes in patterns are discussed, and services are changed to meet changing expectations. The Dean of Enrollment Management tracks persistence, voluntary departures, and transfers. When departures and transfers occur, those students are contacted to understand why they chose to leave Northwest. The Director of the Talent Development Center measures the effectiveness of the supplemental instruction provided for at-risk students. The Vice President for Student Affairs monitors residence hall utilization, dining services, the bookstore, Wellness Center (health and counseling services statistics), Threat Assessment Team (mental health student crisis response) statistics, international student services statistics, minority student services statistics, student activity services statistics, volunteer services statistics, and discipline statistics.
During the academic year, the Dean of Enrollment Management reports at least weekly to the Provost regarding marketing and enrollment results and any applicable academic needs. Cabinet members receive monthly reports comparing recruiting results with previous years. Departments integrate key findings into departmental planning activities.
Departments also use information from our students and stakeholders (see table that begins on the next page) to market their programs and align their activities to meet the needs of students who enroll in them. They are assisted by the Enrollment Management LEADS team, which analyzes and integrates these data into a comprehensive marketing strategy for each department’s potential student subsegment. When appropriate, Student Affairs isolates emerging social trends so they can develop co-curricular programming that proactively addresses behavioral issues that might impede student success. Examples include peer education programs focused on leadership development, healthy relationships, wellness, sexual harassment/assault prevention, alcohol and drug abuse, suicide prevention, and issues of diversity.
How Northwest keeps listening and learning methods current. The Office of Assessment, Information, and Analysis (OAIA) collects, stores, and displays data. The office works with other campus leaders to systematically review all instruments and surveys. When campus leaders request feedback on annual reports and five-year program reviews or when departments engage in major SSPP revisions, the OAIA facilitates discussion on instrumentation and surveys. Areas covered include: Do the data collection instruments and surveys align with our KQIs? Are they relevant to the subsegment being queried? Do they produce timely and actionable data for the user? Are they user-friendly? Will they provide trend data? Will we be able to make comparisons? Can data collection methods be combined with other instruments to minimize the data collection effort? Can we reduce turnaround time? Can we use technology to increase convenience and/or efficiency?
Individual owners of listening and learning methods are asked to keep their methods current. Further, leadership group discussions produce feedback on voicing methods. Other methods to keep our Listening and Learning System current include the formal benchmarking of similar programs and processes (e.g., Disney, Container Store) and the review of Baldrige-based feedback reports by the SPC and Cabinet members.
Northwest's Use of Student and Stakeholder Voices:
|
Student Voice
|
Subsegment VoiceNote: Student subsegment methods are too numerous to provide; examples follow:
|
Faculty and Staff voices
|
Alumni Voice
|
Community and Region VoiceEggs and Issues (periodic); provides business/civic leaders’ perspectives on current topics; information used by President’s Cabinet and other leaders to identify issues for collaborative resolution and initiatives for joint undertaking.
|
Other Voices
|
|
Common method across ALL VOICES, including faculty/staff as well as suppliers/partners Comment Card system (ongoing); yields positive referrals and complaint data; data aggregated by President’s office and used to uncover trends and special cause variance; also used by departments to celebrate accolades and drive improvements. |
Northwest’s approach to relationship-building has progressed from singular activities to a system of key interactions based on learning what works and does not work for students and stakeholders. Departments and key process owners determine appropriate methods, deliver the method (many times in conjunction with cross-functional representatives), assess the methods (through department SSPPs), and adjust offerings as needed. Relationship-building methods (see next page) are part and parcel of the Culture of Quality’s “family atmosphere.” These methods integrate with KQIs, listening and learning methods described in the following table, and the SSPP, and are deployed to all faculty, staff, and student employees, as appropriate. Relationship-building methods as described below allow us to increase chances for student success, meet and exceed expectations for learning, satisfy students and other Northwest family members, and foster new and continuing interactions and positive referrals.
Northwest's Key Relationship-Building |
Prospective Students
|
Current StudentsKey players: All employees
|
Student SubsegmentsNote: Student subsegment methods are too numerous to provide; list of sources is available on site; examples follow Freshmen: Advantage Week/SOAR (required orientation deigned to enhance student success), Freshman Seminar (required first-year course with student peer advisors), freshmen residence hall programming. |
Alumni
|
Faculty and Staff
|
Community/RegionKey players: Office of University Advancement
Key relationship-building methods: Eggs and Issues meetings, sporting/cultural events, regular meetings/luncheons/workshops/conferences with/at High Schools, workshops/visits with community colleges |
Other Family Members
|
Common Methods for AllComment Card system: Provides for feedback on relationships. |
|
Evaluation and improvement of relationship-building methods: |
Using proactive, internal processes, shared governance groups analyze trend data through environmental scans and appropriately plan for changing conditions (e.g., Enrollment Mgmt LEADS team, academic departments’ SSPPs, Alternative certification in the professional education unit). External factors also influence educational offerings. These factors are: a CBHE statewide coordinated plan for higher education, which places an emphasis on Math, Engineering, Technology, and Science programming; the Missouri Higher Education Funding Act, which, in part, requires the alignment of curriculum among 2- and 4-year institutions; AAT/BSEd completion agreements; the State’s “Preparing to Care” initiative, which focuses on healthcare professions; the 42-hour General Education curriculum initiative; and, most recently, the Missouri Virtual Instruction Program. We also seek input from our alumni (e.g., via focus groups with key alumni and friends and interest/satisfaction surveys) and Professional Advisory Teams, which Academic departments use to gain insight into their industry’s changing needs. Finally, we use the data from the ACT EIS, which provides trend data to aid in determining students’ interest level in majors and activity areas.
The Comment Card system is the primary mechanism for managing complaints. Students and stakeholders are encouraged by faculty and staff to use Comment Cards to share their thoughts and ideas or to register complaints. The system dates back to 1995 and has gone through five cycles of improvement. The current system provides Comment Cards via card holders in each office and on-line.
Letters, emails, and phone calls may also be documented through the Comment Card process. Comment Cards are sent directly to the President’s office where they are recorded, answered within 48 hours, and then forwarded to the appropriate Cabinet member for investigation and further response. Telephone calls, email, and/or letters are the means used to respond to complaints. On-campus service partners receive feedback through the Comment Card system as well, and in certain cases partners seek out additional information from targeted market segments. After a complaint has been addressed at the Cabinet and/or departmental level, the Cabinet member provides the response and action taken to the President’s staff. The President’s staff analyzes Comment Card data in the aggregate and reports important trends to the Cabinet, which in turn determines if additional corrective actions are required.
In addition to Comment Cards, employees are empowered to respond, as appropriate, to complaints. When possible, employees resolve complaints on the spot; when beyond their capacities to do so, employees report the problem to the appropriate departmental leader to address for corrective actions as appropriate. Sexual harassment complaints, academic dishonesty, and disciplinary complaints are handled through processes delineated in our various student and employee handbooks. These complaint mechanisms provide avenues of appeal for the accused and are reviewed annually to ensure fair and legal practices.
Satisfaction determination tools help serve as voicing as well as relationship-building processes. The table below, right, summarizes Northwest’s approach to determining student, alumni, and community/region satisfaction.
Satisfaction Determination Methods |
| Students: National Surveys/Sources |
|
| Students: Locally Developed Surveys/Sources |
|
| Alumni: National Survey |
|
| Alumni: Local Source |
|
| Community/Region Sources |
|
Service and enrollment KQIs are key markers for understanding satisfaction and dissatisfaction indicators and measures. The Comment Card system also provides us a mechanism for determining and quickly responding to trends of dissatisfaction, as do departmental focus groups. Integration of satisfaction and dissatisfaction into the SSPP occurs through SI and process owners.
We garner key information on perceived value and positive referrals from the Noel-Levitz surveys. Dissatisfaction indicators, such as gains and losses of students and Comment Card complaints, are used in the ongoing evaluation of our processes, programs, and services. The Dean of Enrollment Management and the Provost provide regular student attrition updates via meetings with various leadership groups and by email. We also use student exit interviews to understand student satisfaction/dissatisfaction issues.
Prompt follow-up to Comment Cards has already been explained. The OAIA is primarily responsible for analyzing and synthesizing University-wide satisfaction assessment information, and we report findings to leadership groups and local media upon analysis. Departments follow up on SSPP satisfaction findings via emails, bulletin-board postings, and student meetings. Follow-up with alumni comes via the Alumni Outcomes Assessment instrument. The President and/or Provost follow up with key academic partners via annual in-person meetings.
Using the Noel-Levitz, we compare our satisfaction data with national norms and our peer group of 41 institutions. Using the National Survey of Student Engagement, we compare Masters I institutions and national norms. The Survey of Alumni provides peer institution and national comparative data regarding alumni satisfaction. A survey of superinten¬dents provides us with a measure of their satisfaction with our graduates compared to other providers. We also use the ACT’s National Collegiate Dropout and Graduation Rates to compare with Northwest’s retention rates. (Generally speaking, a school’s retention rate correlates strongly with its student satisfaction rates.) Through gap analysis, we use these comparisons to understand preferences, identify key satisfiers relative to performance, set targets, and identify opportunities for improvement. Identified improvements are fed from appropriate leaders and leadership groups to departments for use in improving existing processes through the SSPP.